Quote:
Originally posted by boatin
Well, I don't want to get into a debate about semantics. Perhaps I meant something different by "offend" than you do. However, my 'question' remains the same:
The things that Clinton did bother/offend/insult/rile you - I have read many a denigrating thread about Clinton started by you. I'm suggesting that the things that Bush has done, to an objective observer, are similarly horrific. He went AWOL for christ sake! Isn't that breaking an oath/promise?
So, given that each has done naughty things, how do you choose one over the other? I'm not saying that you can't/shouldn't choose, I'm just saying you become partisan politics when you do. And maybe that's ok for you. But I don't see partisan politics moving us forward.
But no, I don't see you shying away. That's what we like about you!
|
The things that Clinton did
rile me. That would probably be the best description. I guess it just drives me nuts that the dude could flat out lie to
all the American people, but even worse he betrayed the trust of his family. Maybe the reason that kind of stuff drives me insane is because my dad is a pile of shit.
About Bush, before the war started there wasn't a nice thing that you could ever find on TFP v3.0, but after the war started I liked the fact that he stuck to his guns and did what he said he was gonna do. If Clinton was in charge of the war I'd support him 100% also even though I hate him. I will never speak badly of the president and troops in time of war. After all this war crap is over I'll get back to pointing out the things I dislike about Bush..... Just give it time. OK? I'll be the first to admit there are things fucked up about Bush, but why is it that people won't admit the same about Clinton?