thingstodo

I don't understand the nuance of what you mean here. Evidence - proof.... doesn't one lead to the other? Or is this a technicality of the term "definition?" To me what you are trying to say is that there are plenty of opinions derived in part from some factual evidence that has been interpreted in many ways, never leading to proof.


Is that saying the same thing a different way?

__________________
If you're wringing your hands you can't roll up your shirt sleeves.

Stangers have the best candy.