Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. If Hussien has produced this kind of proof that he lacked WMDs, would we have invaded? Of course we would have. We did. So did he.
Look, if you belive GW is an honorable man, that's cool - I think you're being played for a sucker, but it's your opinion and your right - and no amount of proof is likely to convince you otherwise. If, on the other hand, you think he is a congenitally moronic pathologically lying amoral bastard who has surrounded himself with evil men who tell him exactly what to do at all times, like I do, then no amount of proof otherwise is going to make a difference.
So, you gotta ask yourself, do you trust the man, and, if so, why. If you can answer that to your own satisfaction, well, I can't convince you otherwise. If you can't, then look around. There are plenty of reasons to believe that the man will not tell the truth when a lie will serve as well.
(Superbelt - love the reasoned arguments. Also, that's a great new avatar and status.)
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
|