Strange, as I already showed in another thread, it's pretty much impossible to prove Blair lied, if he lied at all. Just because tons of people believe something, this does not make it true.
I for one am getting a bit fed up with this whole debate. The war has happened, Saddam's regime was removed, Iraq is free. Are we now going to spend years talking about one tiny little detail in the vast amount of things that were said before, during and after the war? Is that the best the anti-war crowd has to offer?
"Blair was incorrect about (insert petty detail), so he must have lied about everything, which proves he is evil incarnate, and therefore he must resign!" Get over yourself, will ya!
(And FYI: I supported the war regardless of the whole WMD issue, so I couldn't care less about this whole 45-minute claim.)
|