Quote:
Originally posted by Dragonlich
As for your reasons: even your agreement with point 2 doesn't matter.
|
A point of clarification: I'm not stating that I agree with my second point as the reason Saddam didn't comply with UN inspections. I'm agreeing with the concept that a sovereign nation is not obligated to subject itself to a foreign entity as a matter of principle.
edit:
here was your first fallacy:
If Saddam has nothing to hide, he will prove it. Since he did not prove it, he must have something to hide.
This is an appeal to ignorance (among other things but I only need one).