View Single Post
Old 02-07-2004, 08:16 AM   #23 (permalink)
Lasereth
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Quote:
Originally posted by KnifeMissle
[B]I'm not sure what you mean by plug and play networking. If there's a DHCP server lying around, all the MS OS's of the last decade "just work." I also don't understand what a "USB installation" is. You're installing universal serial busses? Every USB device (although nothing uncommon) I've ever plugged into my machine has simply worked.
I've ran 95, 98, and ME, and none of those allowed easy networking, even using DHCP server-style hubs or routers. It took hours to get all computers on the network working properly, especially if they weren't in the same workgroup. With Windows XP, you simply plug all of the computers into the hub or router, and they automatically work. I can go from DSL to Cable to huge LAN with the network settings adhering to the changes without moving a finger. The previous Windows OS's would NOT do that. You had to change the settings yourself, sometimes taking a very long time with Windows 9X.

Yeah, I'm talking about USB Devices. On previous Windows versions, I've never been able to get USB devices to work by simply plugging them in. You always have to use a CD or a floppy to install the drivers. If a friend wants to connect a USB device on your computer, you couldn't unless you had the driver. Windows XP has a ton of drivers built into it, and everything I've plugged in from printers to webcams to flash drives has worked instantly with no drivers needed. The previous Windows versions do not have this support -- you have to have the drives or it won't work.

Quote:
Originally posted by KnifeMissle
What options did you expect to need changing? What magic can XP do that gives it sufficient information to participate in a network that the other OS's couldn't determine? As far as I've ever experienced, the other OS's are just as "automatic," if your network is set up that way.


Ever tried to connect multiple computers together with Windows 9X or 2K? It's not that easy, and it's sure as hell not automatic. I'd consider XP's networking automatic, since it works every damned time with any computer that has XP on it. Maybe my network isn't "set up that way," but everything was solved one I got Windows XP. Ever been to a LAN party? Everyone that has XP is able to join games immediately while the Windows 9X and 2K users have to configure their settings to allow this and that, with half of them NEVER being shown on the network.

Quote:
Originally posted by KnifeMissle
[BPlug and play is such a buzz word that I don't even know what it's supposed to mean. The OS has built-in drivers for all the hardware you're likely to install on your system?
Plug and play is basically "plug it into your PC and it works." The driverbase is a good example. Like I said earlier, you couldn't just plug in something in Windows 9X or 2K and it work, you had to install the drivers 95% of the time. With Windows XP, that's gone for the most part. Some oddball components still require driver installation, but it's a hundred times better than needing it for every single component you owned. Hell, in the earlier OS's, Windows didn't even recognize if you plugged anything in -- you had to TELL it that you plugged something in, then it scanned to see if you weren't joking, and THEN it told you it had to have the drivers. XP immediately sees you're trying to install something, installs it if it has the drivers, and asks for them if it doesn't. A big step if you ask me.

Quote:
Originally posted by KnifeMissle
[BWhat's important to you?
Yeah, I suppose it is what's important to each individual user, and easy networking, driver support, and plug and play component installation is worth it to me. I've used all of the Windows versions since 95 came out, and XP is simply above the rest in my view. I wouldn't go back to even 2000 unless I wanted server stability.

-Lasereth
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360