Quote:
Originally posted by arch13
Re-read this a couple times and you'll realize it makes no sense.
|
Done. Prediction false.
Quote:
|
Avoiding the moral argument, the law is the law. And the law of the land is that the 72 hour pill has been approved for use in this country. He is expected to follow the law, and the law is that no person shall be held from seeking a prescription filled who has been legally authorized to seek a prescription by a doctor.
|
The law is wrong in this situation. One has the right to seek out those who sell the wanted prescription. One does not have the right to force any person to sell such a product.
Quote:
|
If i was a doctor and i denied you treatment because you where white and i disliked whites, i would be disbarred. he denied a woman treatment as a medical worker (as pharmasists are classified) and thus there is no difference from my example as both are discrimination.
|
Except that the refusal had nothing to do with the patient's habits and everything to do with the effects of the drug. There's no bigotry here.
Quote:
|
As a medical worker he is expected to check his personal opinions at the door when he is dealing with the health and well being of others. Any medical proffesional who cannot do that presents a possable risk to patients and should be removed.
|
Sure. And I would be ignoring the health and well-being of others if I dispensed that drug.