Quote:
Originally posted by FoolThemAll
Well, let's simplify.
If it's a human being we're talking about, then rape is a nonsensical exception.
If it's just a clump of cells we're talking about, then rape is a nonsensical and unneeded exception. No justification would be necessary.
|
Re-read this a couple times and you'll realize it makes no sense.
Avoiding the moral argument, the law is the law. And the law of the land is that the 72 hour pill has been approved for use in this country. He is expected to follow the law, and the law is that no person shall be held from seeking a prescription filled who has been legally authorized to seek a prescription by a doctor.
If i was a doctor and i denied you treatment because you where white and i disliked whites, i would be disbarred. he denied a woman treatment as a medical worker (as pharmasists are classified) and thus there is no difference from my example as both are discrimination.
As a medical worker he is expected to check his personal opinions at the door when he is dealing with the health and well being of others. Any medical proffesional who cannot do that presents a possable risk to patients and should be removed.
And as for my opinion since you brought it up,
It's just a clump of identical cells similar to cancer for the first trimester.
It has no conciousness. By third trimster i could view it as a living being, but it is not anything 72 hours or even two months. Sorry.
What your arguing for is the
possability that something may exist given sufficient time, not that something currently exists that can be killed.
{mods, if my last part is a thread jack, please delete}