Quote:
Originally posted by Strange Famous
*snip*
|
I agree, I would just as soon not get into such a debate.
So I will only point out that your article contains no sources against which to check, while my information comes from the people (SIPRI) that are usually quoted by others.
At least, SIPRI was cited as a source by no less than 4 of the 6 websites I looked at in relationship to world wide arms sales.
Edited to say,
And even that article never says they US sold chemical weapons to Iraq. It says that we sold the "precursers", i.e. the things that Saddam could turn into weapons. These things can also be used for peaceful research.
So please quit saying things that even your own sources don't say.