I think I'm missing the point of this test... its not a question of what we would think if clinton did these things, because Clinton certainly wouldn't have done the last two things at all... thats the reason dems bash bush is because clinton wouldn't have done followed the same actions, not because it isn't clinton doing it.
As for Iraq, there have already been many threads but I would tell anyone who says there was "no reason to go into Iraq" to reexamine reality... the reasons they sold us were, to a certain extent, BS, there's no doubt there (human rights, WMD), but there was and is much being gained in the war on terror and Al Qaeda by occupying Iraq and forcing Osama to throw his resources at us there... is this democratic or fair? probably not, but is it worthwhile, yes
|