View Single Post
Old 01-31-2004, 03:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
wilbjammin
* * *
 
2005 Pentagon budget and Missile Defense System

I don't typically like to post in politics, because of how discussions typically degenerate... but I can't resist on this one.

US Defense bill to exceed $400bn

Quote:
American defence spending is set to pass the $400bn mark next year.
President George W Bush is set to ask Congress for the funding in his 2005 budget request which he will formally submit on Monday.

The budget proposals, inadvertently posted on the Pentagon's website, also reflect the effects of recent wars.

The budget request represents a 7% increase on last year's total and the big winner appears to be the Pentagon's controversial missile defence system.

It is set to see an almost 20% increase in its budget.

This system, which is currently being built in Alaska, is designed to track and intercept long range missiles.


The Bush administration argues it is necessary to protect America from rogue nations that could fire missiles loaded with weapons of mass destruction.

But critics say the system is too expensive and relies on unproven technology.

'Not enough'

Funding increases are proposed to repair and replace tanks and armoured personnel carriers, many of which have been severely battered by the harsh Iraqi environment.

Unmanned aerial vehicles, which have been used extensively in Afghanistan - mainly for intelligence gathering, but sometimes carrying missiles - will also see budgetary rises.

But despite the budget's anticipated $401bn price tag, it is unlikely to be enough to cover what the defence department says it needs.

The Pentagon is expected to ask Congress for tens of billions of dollars more later this year, specifically to fund its operations in Iraq.
What is up with our priorities!? A missile defense system just adds to the arms race, and wastes a lot of money because the chances are pretty good that it won't work very well in a real world scenario. So much money goes to the Pentagon for things that it doesn't need. What about the troops in Iraq that aren't given adequate equipment? Even the Pentagon admits this package isn't enough, but they include Missile Defense in it? This situation is so frustrating!
__________________
Innominate.
wilbjammin is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360