Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
You people just don't get it, nor want to because you are blinded by your hatred for Bush.
WMD's were a credible threat. If you would be willing to remove your head from your nether-regions you would be able to notice how Saddam was in MATERIAL BREACH of 1441, not to mention his long list of non-compliance. Every major intelligence agency in the WORLD had information stating Saddam had the WMD's, The U.N. itself suspected it. To many holes in Saddam's declarations of programs. Not mention that he had programs still running the whole time.
Also for the love of Jesus would you people please stop your fucking belly aching over "How Bush Stole the White House~!~!~!!!!!". He won it fair and square and how the constitution intended it. Furthermore it has been argued on these forums so much there is no sense in trying to resusitate the dead horse, it's something you have to live with... Fucking deal with it and vote in 04'.
|
*BS detector implodes* Okay time for some non-spin and please leave the Ad homs at home because they aren't valid tactics and if you want to pointout someone has their head up their arse atleast try to prove that instead of using a blanket statement.
No matter how hard you wish it was true, 1441 had NOTHING to do with WMD being in Iraq it involved Iraq not complying with inspections. If Saddam was in material breech of 1441, which is rather subjective since it isn't a binary yes/no decision, then the UN should have done something about it, not the US. Saddam didn't have WMD, deal with it, an intelligency agency can say "Bush actually chimp in man-suit" but no matter how likely that statement it is worthless without evidence.
Quote:
|
He won it fair and square and how the constitution intended it.
|
Since when did the constitution give judicial review to the Supreme Court, who decided the 2000 election in Bush's favor ? If anything, that election was the exact opposite of what the constitution intended since the election was decided by a non-elected olgarchy.