Quote:
Originally posted by Sun Tzu
shakran,
I never stated they were there for mind control. Its my view based on what Ive read and observed that they are weather related, HAARP related, and special frequency related.
I wasnt stating the top picture were radioactive chemtrails; I know theres a sunset there. I was comparing the two because of the question you asked; which still puzzles me a little. You obviously are versed on aircraft; are you really perplexed on where they would find room for chemicals.
|
No, there's plenty of room to store the chemicals on the plane. Where I'm perplexed is that the chemtrails believers say EVERY major airline is involved, which is logical if you assume chemtrails exist because you'd have to use every major airline to get full coverage over the country. The problem I have with this idea is that I've crawled all over, around, inside, and through every type of jet Northwest flies. I've seen parts of the airplane even the pilots never see, and I never saw any chemical dispensation system. Sure, they could remove the tank to keep it from my sight (except that they never knew I was coming - my friend and I would just show up when we were bored and felt like being nerds for a day). So if they removed the tank, they've still got fluid lines from the tank to the outside of the aircraft (how you gonna hide the hole you leave in the body if you remove the fluid line, btw). You have the wiring, the electronic valve to open the lines and dispense the chemicals, the return line to maintain pressure in the system, and of course the switch in the cockpit to turn the thing on. None of this stuff was present on ANY of the airplanes I played around on.
Quote:
DId you read through any of the info I provided.
A good place to start is google and type in "hr2977 congress"
Id provide a link but it doesnt seem to work from there. Find the 2002 version. Then look at the current version at the library of congress.
|
I'll read it, but tomorrow. It's 2am
Quote:
What Im understanding from you is that your stating there is just as much reason to dispprove theres something grey going on as there to believe it to be true, but the fact the government is denying it it must not be true. Is that correct?
|
Oh hell no - I tend to mistrust just about everything the government says. However, my mistrust goes toward their usual activities, like when they say bullshit such as "the economy is great" or "no, Bush did not orchestrate the theft of the election in Florida."
The flip side is that just because the government denies something doesn't mean it's automatically true. If the government isn't dumping chemtrails, and someone accuses them of it, of course they're gonna deny it.
and nope, I'm not a jet pilot. Just a serious aviation nerd who's had a LOT of exposure to the big jets.