Quote:
No behavior is ever always moral or always immoral.
|
Theft for selfish reasons? Lying for selfish reasons? Rape? Murder?
Quote:
That is to say, a gay man likes to sex-up other men, but isn't compulsively sexxing-up another man at every opportunity. Kleptos steal uncontrollably. Stealing also requires a victim, homosexuality does not.
|
Two good points. I'll conceed that it can't be a great analogy. The main point of it is the idea that homosexuality/kleptomania can lead to spiritually unhealthy (immoral) behavior, so it's a good idea to treat it.
Quote:
Funny thing is that you can "cure" anyone of anything depending on the method used.
|
Yeah, I know. The question is whether or not it
should be cured.
Quote:
Why must it be treated and why is it immoral ?
|
Not 'must'. I leave that choice up to the person (or if a minor, his/her guardian). 'Should' is the word I used.
Are you really questioning whether theft is immoral?
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that any behavior can lead to immorality
|
But that's not what I said. I talked of the idea that the behavior
itself immoral.
Quote:
In essence, homosexuality is no more moral or immoral than any other activity on the face of the earth, including posting on the TFP.
|
Homosexuality isn't an activity. It's a condition. Conditions can't be moral or immoral, they aren't choices.
Is moral relativism lurking about? Because if it is, I can make this really simple.