Quote:
Originally posted by FoolThemAll
When someone uses their property to threaten the rights of others, their property rights can be justly overruled for that particular piece of property. But kleptomania is not needed whatsoever to effect such 'theft' and as far as I know, kleptomania doesn't limit itself to that kind of theft.
You get what I'm saying, right? I have the feeling we're arguing over some unimportant technicality. Except the theft of food thing, which I'd rather not get into (unless you insist).
|
I was just pointing that most moral absolutes are rather non-absolute when details are involved.
Kelptomania might be an asset, you will develop a lot of dexterity if you are stealing all the time. You might also have a higher awareness of your surrounding.
All joking aside, mental "differences" as society sees them are just that, "differences", they have no weight on worth of the individual if their is such a thing.
If you really want to get into the defect vs. difference debate, I have somewhere in the range of 1500 pages of literature on the topic of mental health.
