|
Technically the child would be up for the Darwin award. In order to get a Darwin award you have to have removed yourself from the gene pool, which the child did. But given the age of the child I think it's a bit insensitive to say that the kid is up for a Darwin award, when clearly the father is really at fault. Since the father is still alive and able to procreate, then there is no basis for a Darwin award.
__________________
It was like that when I got here....I swear.
|