View Single Post
Old 01-20-2004, 04:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Zamunda
Tilted
 
Green Diplomacy and Lower Energy Prices: Hopes for the Next Administration

If this article sounds overly prepared, it is. I wrote this for a liberal magazine, and I'd like to share it to see if anyone else has the hopes for new energy that I have, and thinks the govt. should take a more active role.

There are two major reasons why the United States should develop alternative energy sources. The first and most obvious reason is that alternative energy such as hydrogen power and fuel cells would be much cheaper and better for the environment than our current energy staple, oil. The second, and perhaps not as evident, reason is that it is in our best interest as a country to eliminate the constraints that our oil dependency has placed on our international relations and economy.
While the prospect of having cheap and clean energy may be impetus enough for some to stop believing in oil, the larger incentive should come from the greater flexibility it would give U.S. economy and foreign policy around the world. In the Middle East the United States compromises its own international ideology by supporting the feudal and chauvinistic Saudi Arabian Government; surprisingly, Saudi Arabia is also the top oil exporter to the U.S. Our support of Saudi Arabia has the added negative effect of making them a lightning rod for the political tensions in the region. Likewise in South America, we tolerate the corrupt and repressive regimes of Venezuela and Colombia in order to secure their oil exports which rank fourth and seventh respectively. Of course, the explanation for what many would see as bad foreign policy is that in these regions our oil dependency, and not logical ideology, governs our foreign policy. At the very least our oil policy is dangerous, as we depend on many politically unstable countries around the world for 60% of our oil; we have already suffered from two boycotts by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which damaged our economy, and OPEC remains in a position to damage our economy further. Our oil dependency also limits our budget, as we import over 110 billion dollars of crude oil every year, which contributes to the 375 billion dollar U.S. trade deficit. To the extent that it is driven by our need to import oil our foreign policy is irrational because it draws us into dangerous and complicated situations where we do not belong. This fact, combined with the prospect of cheap and clean energy should provide enough incentive for every American citizen from the small-lot car dealer to the President to move away from oil.
The most attractive alternative to oil lies in the use of hydrogen, either in a fuel cell or as a fuel by itself. In fact, there are no great leaps of technology required to use hydrogen as a fuel or in a fuel cell. The technology for fuel cells and hydrogen fuel is fairly simple, and very green; the only byproducts from using hydrogen as a fuel are pure water and heat. A typical PEM fuel cell, a light variety best for use in cars and trucks, is composed of a Cathode and an Anode, which reacts with hydrogen, peeling off electrons and sending them through a wire to the Cathode, creating current. Such fuel cell systems are already on the market from the Ballard Company in Burnaby, Canada. A cell similar to this will also be used for the Daimler Chrysler Necar 4, which should be released to the U.S. market in 2004. Like the fuel cell, using hydrogen as a fuel in a combustible engine is already a reality. While slight modifications are needed, such as a new cooling system and a direct fuel injector to stop backflashing (where gaseous hydrogen is ignited before entering the carburetor) the benefits of such a clean fuel far outweigh the small cost needed for application.
One technological barrier lies in the way of a cleaner hydrogen-fueled economy, the availability of hydrogen. If hydrogen were to become what oil is today, methods of producing hydrogen must be looked into. There are many methods to isolate hydrogen in the atmosphere or in water, such as solar electrolysis and special varieties of algae; however, more research must go into extracting hydrogen before it could fill our energy needs.
Since there are so many benefits to be reaped from the relatively easy changeover from oil to alternative energy sources, one must ask, “What is the government doing to advance alternate energy?” The most recent House of Representatives hearing on foreign oil dependency was on June 20, 2002; while many energy issues were brought up, more effort was placed on securing more sources for oil than on alternate sources of energy. The only step taken by the Bush administration in the direction of alternate energy is the FreedomCAR program, which supports tax reductions for hybrid and electric cars.
A little known section of the U.S. Patent Laws reveals the true and longstanding attitude of the government towards alternate energy. Under U.S. Patent Law Section 181, with regard to an alternate energy patent, "the Atomic Energy Commission, the Secretary of Defense, and the chief officer of any other department or agency of the Government designated by the President as a defense agency of the United States" has the power to "withhold the grant of a patent." Only one patent has been let through this government hold, a cold fusion process that is owned by the CETI Corporation in Texas. All others who have tried have been sworn to secrecy under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951.

While there is still some work to do to begin using hydrogen for practical energy purposes, the benefits from energy security, better foreign policy, and a cheap and clean energy source far outweigh the cost of research. Obviously a changeover cannot happen tomorrow, and may not even happen in this century, but as oil supplies dwindle, prices rise, and more pollution enters the atmosphere, it must happen. Unfortunately, while the government is adamant about energy security, it is also apathetic towards alternate energy. As President Bush and Vice President Cheney are both former oil men with enduring links to the industry, there is little hope for any energy solution from this administration. Since we need the government’s power to help with the energy changeover, we who want cheap and clean energy must make our views known to our elected representatives today to prompt change tomorrow.
Zamunda is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360