Yes I'll agree the article spins it to make it look worse than it is, but it doesn't change the fact that it prohibits some people - from many different religions - from practicing their religion freely. That's hat the problem is here.
Secularism in government is a wonderful and noble goal to strive for, but secularism in government doesn't equate to prohibiting regular citizens from openly being religious. We're not talking about government workers here.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout
"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
|