01-14-2004, 04:39 PM
|
#90 (permalink)
|
|
Psycho
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chavos
Paper: thank you for revising your tone...
Understood... The problem is that we've been talking about the evidence we see. You simply disagree with how to interpret said evidence. That's fine...but acknowledge that there is an interpretive debate. Ultimately, most of us understand that faith is arational. It is not understood soley with reason, nor does it stand in direct defiance of our intellectual capabilities...but it is reliant on knowledge that is non-testable in a scientific means.
Aside from some perjorative language, and the conclusions as to the value of arational thinking and evidence...that's the same thing i see you saying.
|
Agreed.  |
|
|