View Single Post
Old 01-14-2004, 10:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
onetime2
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally posted by Sparhawk
First you start out with an ad hominem attack, then you mischaracterize the estate and capital gains tax. Bravo.

Most families save through tax-deferred savings plans, so when they 'cash out' the government is taking a chunk of it, yes. And when they die, they are taxed on a percentage of their estate if it is worth a ridiculous amount of money (and that no longer makes them most families, or even 'a lot' of families - more like 'tiny minority' of families), yes.

The policies may say that spending powers the economy, and that will eventually trickle down into benefits to the consumer, but the average consumer isn't seeing it. Like the author said, the fourth quarter '03 saw real wages drop 0.7 percent.
I will absolutely point out the idiocy of an article/writer that attempts to describe the current economic climate and completely ignores perhaps the most important economic fact since WWII. We have seen unreal levels of productivity increases but you ignore that fact as well, so I guess it's no surprise that you hold this article in such high regard.

Real wages dropped by .07 percent, more productivity means fewer hours needed to produce an equal amount of goods. When productivity reaches a certain point it means, not only are fewer hours needed, but fewer workers are needed.

Where did the money for investment come from? How about the money that's in these estates? They came from income. Income that was already taxed when either you or the deceased earned it and put it away with the hope that it would fund your retirement or your family's futures. You complain that the budget deficit is robbing America's children of their futures, what do you think taking 30%+ from the estates of their dead parents is doing?

Capital gains taxes and estate taxes are not to recoup the taxes delayed in tax deferred savings programs. Quite a substantial amount of personal savings is a home's value. The limits on gains for homes is far from a "ridiculous amount of money".
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360