for what it's worth, what I meant by "don't care" was that you were OK being lied to about this. Sorry for the semantic confusion.
My question (for anyone) is this: if they will lie about something as big as a reason to go to war, what won't he/they lie about? Doesn't the conservative 'side' bitch and moan that the problem with Clinton is that he lied? It's sure my issue with him.
It seems that when you agree with the lie, that makes it ok. Where is the consistency?
Or does the fact that Clinton's was under oath make it different? Seems like keeping faith with the American public is the issue, no matter which oath we are talking about.
|