Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
Lets see was Saddam allowed to have these weapons after he signed aforementioned peace accords in 1991? Oh yeah thats right, no he wasn't. Does this put him in direct violation of 1441 and other UN resolutions, oh yeah it does.
What spin do you anti-bush/anti-American liberals want to put on this now?
|
I don't care if it was in violation of 1441, the possesion of a couple of 15 year old mortars does NOT justify all these GI's dying, he over 100 BILLION dollars, and all of this stuff that we as a country have to go through.
Seriously, other countries violate accords and treaties set out from before, but we can't go invading the entire world now can we?