Quote:
|
Then again, if you had signed a piece of paper that said you lawfully had to let them into your house, and then refused them entry, I would say its a little suspicious.
|
I agree it is suspicious. But lets not forget that the entire modern worlds concept of justice isn't based on suspicion equalling guilt. If police had a warrant to search my home and I was mandated by a court agree to said search, that in no way makes me obligated to like the search, help the search, or even not interfere with the search. If I were to obstructive I could be jailed or in Saddams case have my country ravaged, live in filth for several months and then be jailed but you get the point. If the reason given for ousting Saddam had been because he was being obstructive to inspectors then thats the UNs business because they were their inspectors and it is with them that Saddam had the agreement, not us. However, this was not our reason. We invaded because we said that Saddam had WMDs and we knew it. The having WMDs was obviously near criminally poor intelligence and the us knowing it thing was obviously a blatant lie.