Quote:
Originally posted by SLM3
bowlingfortruth.com
mooreexposed.com
Thank you, these are exactly the type of objective, truth seeking sources I was looking for. Bang up job.
So, what you're saying is you really didn't have a source beyond these fanatics who made it their mission to discredit Moore at all costs. You made a blanket statement and then led me on a wild goose hunt through the FBI, the Office of Justice Programs, then two sites based solely on attacking Moore. Basically you decided to pass something off as fact and THEN scrambled to find a site that fit what you said. You'll please excuse me if I take everything you say with a grain of salt.
8,000, 9,000, 11,000...do you see my point about focusing on the wrong issues? So if Moore was a couple thousand off on his number, does that negate the greater point he's trying to make? People focus on things like what one particular Lockheed Martin plant was producing at one given time (missing the whole freaking point of discussing what is indeed the world's largest weapons maker) instead of asking the big questions. Why do Americans kill each other so much more than any other Western state?
Like saying Australian numbers range from 64-123 really makes a huge difference in the grand scheme of what we should be talking about. What a waste of time.
If Moore was so out to deceive us, I wonder why he didn't go with the 15,000+ rate. Was he just being sort of deceitful? Quasi-deceitful? Do you really know his motive or are you going to let mooreexposed.com tell you?
SLM3
|
So you have a critisicm about those sities other than slaming them for existing? You are basically saying that Moore is allowed to have an agenda, and those sites are wrong BECAUSE they have an agenda.
I talked about Moore's incorrect facts, and you went after the websites themselves, just as Moore himself does with his "whacko Attacko" articles.
I challenge you to find error in those sites. But that is tough as then you have to acutall do something rather than issue proclaimations and condemnations without reading. But thats what I expect from Moore fans.
And you made no point at showing that anyting i said was incorrect other than saying that its ok or Moore to have an agenda, and not anyone else. Pretty hypocritical of you.