[QUOTE]Originally posted by charliex
[B]You have to be a microsoft certified systems OEM to have the right to attach COA stickers, which you have to obtain from them or a licensed distributor, otherwise you are selling illegal versions on, and some poor sucker who runs a business using them might get caught out, it happens all the time. This is a very simple procedure and any valid OEM can apply for it.
Its not a legal license, a COA is not a software license, thats why its called a COA.
As for the cut, i doubt any of that money is going to MS
Charliex,
I do thank you for your input. It has given me much to ponder. As far as absolute right and wrong, you seem to have made a most clear argument, and your implied experience seems to be sound in this matter.
I chose not to argue this point at all. I will defer to your assumed knowledge in this cesspool.
So, please weigh in on my perceived transgressions:
I have built a dozen or so machines with COA holograms on the basis of charity. All have been activated with no problem. All work fine after more than a year. No stormtroopers. None for businesses. Mostly for churches.
My understanding was that Microsoft's "activation" of these, well, numbers/stickers/holograms was their complicit acceptance of said hologram purchases.
I'm sensing enough legalese in the websight you posted to cofuse anyone. I didn't see anything about needing to be a Certified Microsoft System OEM on that page, which I assume is just paying them a big fee.
Don't take my post as a challenge, I love learning from the learned as much as anyone. Basically, my point is, from trial and error, I've installed XP with $55 and a hologram several times. Home users. I don't think I'm going to lose any sleep over it either way. It works. Without the "activation" clause, Win98 spread faster than a virus.
And my questioning of your *asterisks* was more pointed to the fact that most asterisks have a subversive or hidden meaning. Mere emphasis noted.
|