| [QUOTE]Originally posted by charliex [B]You have to be a microsoft certified systems OEM to have the right to attach COA stickers, which you have to obtain from them or a licensed distributor, otherwise  you are selling illegal versions on, and some poor sucker who runs a business using them might get caught out, it happens all the time. This is a very simple procedure and any valid OEM can apply for it.
 
 Its not a legal license, a COA is not a software license, thats why its called a COA.
 As for the cut, i doubt any of that money is going to MS
 
 Charliex,
 
 I do thank you for your input.  It has given me much to ponder.  As far as absolute right and wrong, you seem to have made a most clear argument, and your implied experience seems to be sound in this matter.
 
 I chose not to argue this point at all.  I will defer to your assumed knowledge in this cesspool.
 
 So, please weigh in on my perceived transgressions:
 I have built a dozen or so machines with COA holograms on the basis of charity.  All have been activated with no problem.  All work fine after more than a year.  No stormtroopers.  None for businesses.  Mostly for churches.
 
 My understanding was that Microsoft's "activation" of these, well, numbers/stickers/holograms was their complicit acceptance of said hologram purchases.
 
 I'm sensing enough legalese in the websight you posted to cofuse anyone.  I didn't see anything about needing to be a Certified Microsoft System OEM on that page, which I assume is just paying them a big fee.
 
 Don't take my post as a challenge, I love learning from the learned as much as anyone.  Basically, my point is, from trial and error, I've installed XP with $55 and a hologram several times.  Home users.  I don't think I'm going to lose any sleep over it either way.  It works.  Without the "activation" clause, Win98 spread faster than a virus.
 
 And my questioning of your *asterisks* was more pointed to the fact that most asterisks have a subversive or hidden meaning.  Mere emphasis noted.
 |