I rarely get to quote myself:
Quote:
I understood he was referring to conventional weapons and such. This is why I mentioned Honeywell, Spectra Physics, Semetex, TI Coating, Unisys, Sperry Corp, just to name a few because they provided conventional weapons programs and military logisitcs as opposed to what we commonly refer to as WMD. There's many more who provided conventional weapons programs. I'm just confused as to why these facts as displayed in the 12,000 page dossier aren't reflected in the sources presented in this thread. To me, it seems suspect.
Also, I wonder if the SIPRI figures come from the truncated version of the dossier, which was released to non-permanent members on the security council. The German Press Agency DPA has revealed that this version, altered by the US, omits almost all of the US dealings with Iraq
|
It is my contention that your source does not accurately portray the history of Iraqi arms dealings with the US. You're allowed to disagree. Is that enough?
I did provide information on the dossier, as told by the German Press Agency DPA.
SLM3
SLM3