Quote:
Originally posted by Strange Famous
The fact that Iraq (a sovereign state) had things - possibly for legitimate scientific puporses, or possibly as part of a programme to make weapons to defend itself - from the American attack they knew was coming - which America decreeed that they were not allowed to have is very different from saying hey had WMD.
|
America made no such decree. The UN did, and Saddam did too when he signed the treaty in 91. Sorry to show your errors to the rest of the board.
Quote:
|
This report is just more evidence of what we have all suspected, Iraq had no WMD, and did not pose any immediate threat to anyone.
|
Tell that to the 3 million he killed. And he DID have WMD. The fact that you keep ignoring the evidence is very telling about you.
Quote:
|
Which means, very simply, the UK and US war was based on a lie, a falsehood.
|
Not even true. I find it odd that you are not happy that a man that oppressed his people are now free, I mean isnt that a good thing? You sound like you would be happier if Saddam were still killing people at a rate of 100, 000 per year.