All I am trying to do if talk about the facts.
Your report (which is from a source we must consider dubious anyway) clearly states no weapons at all have been found.
It states that some artifacts that could be used to produce weapons have been found, that is all.
So what we are saying is that there is a possibility that maybe Iraq was trying to produce WMD, but we have found no proof, and no actual weapons.
Furthermore, of course, America would not have attacked if they believed the weapons did exist (that is why they waited for the UN inspectors to tell them there was nothing there), and if Iraq did have the weapons, surely Hussain would have used them as his country collapsed under the Anglo-American attack?
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."
The Gospel of Thomas
|