Quote:
Originally posted by Superbelt
All the experts say they don't have them. Scott Ritter says they don't, so does Blix.
Atomic experts say they didn't even have close to the expertise to build a bomb.
Biological agents have a short lifespan and without support that program gets scrapped.
Saddam was severely restricted in chemicals he could bring in and we have ways of detecting if chemical weapons have been made in an area. Also chemical weapons break down over time. They have short lifespans as well.
Best explanation is that Saddam lost all his weapons abilities after Clintons "Desert Fox" campaign.
Scared of looking weak to his enemy, the Iranians, Saddam bluffed his way through resolutions to appear to still be a threat.
|
You hit the nail right on the head. People seem to forget the REAL reason we went to Iraq, to find these weapons, and 9 months later, to this date, we haven't found a single one. People are still dying for a cause they don't understand, one I'm not even sure if our own President understands.
Getting Saddam is the last saving grace Bush had in this political disaster known as the War in Iraq.