Quote:
Originally posted by 2wolves
In this case as originally noted it is NOT a private economic entity but the community.
Gauging the benefit or harm to the body politic was also something I put forth, but as a policy you have to have good backup to present your case for change. I'd like to see something other than anecdotal tales. As long as it remains within the law the aggrieved party or parties have a chance.
My statement is as appropriate as your trolling about killing people out of hand for the government. Quite.
2Wolves
|
The community, nay the government. If you'd prefer, we can look at motives. As it stands the government in question doesn't even receive tax revenues from the property in question as it's in an adjoining town. As it will be, it will not only gain revenue from the land's eventual use but it will control that land.
As far as anecdotal tales, whatever. There are several threads here that discuss eminent domain abuse, I guess those are all "anecdotal" too and not worthy of discussion.
If you think I'm just trolling then stop responding to me. It's not that hard, you can do it, just don't hit the "submit reply" button and you've achieved it.