Apechild, i'm still waiting for your graph chowing the effects on unemployment of ceo and shareholder greed. Also, do you seriously believe that the average employer will make any more concessions than they have to?
And, how can you claim that union members get paid more than they deserve? That is something only an economist or a ceo would say. To think that the minimum wage 6.?? is more than someone deserves for time they will never get back while their bosses stand to make millions for in some instances comparatively little labr or effort is insulting. I'm sorry, but if all you can see is econ, and antiworker econ at that, you seriously need to take a look at the real world. Maybe you could explain to me why econ, as you are using it, isn't bullshit? How do your models apply to the real world, give an example? Even with an example you'd have to be full of shit if you try to claim that they apply accross the board under all circumstances. Your argument is one-dimensional. You can talk econ all you want, but you have to realize that econ in many instances is nothing more than artistic guesswork. Atleast acknowledge the limits of your argument.
You keep telling us to read up on econ, i have-much of it is bullshit, maybe you could try reading up on labor struggles throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. Then you'd see how quick employers were to provide a safe working environment and better-than-slave wages.
|