Quote:
Originally posted by reconmike
I really do not think GW is worried about saving face, he has some huge balls doing what was right and needed even though the Gore cry babies where whinning and bitching about it.
Maybe just maybe a country will think before aiding a terrorist group.
Example...Syria, North Korea, and Iran all want dialogue now. Why? Because GW has the balls Slick Willie did not have(that is except to put them on that fatty Monica's chin) to stand up to Rogue states with American might.
|
It is stupid to give credit to Dubya for the "preemptive" attacks.
Any president in his/her right mind would do the SAME. Nader or Gore would have bombed Afganistan/Iraq/rest of the world.
Did America think when it was aiding terrorist groups? Or how about when we aided the Taliban? Or sold WMD's to Saddam to kill Iraninans?
Now to your "American might" statement...That is not a way to get the world on our side.
These "rogue" states are bitter and resentful for years of backstabbing and ignorance by the Red White and the Blue. Do you really feel devestating a whole nation will really elimiate the bitterness?
How has the destruction of Baghdad brought, us Americans who are paying for this, any more feeling of safety? Are the Twin Towers back?
The colorful and interesting "Terror threat level" sits at the same spot it was before iraq was destroyed.