Stop. Think. Question.
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
|
Under Windows 2000 and XP you can easily get to these folders by setting Explorer to view all hidden folders.
I imagine that most privacy applications (ie: Window Washer sort of thing) will clear these out for you. I'm not sure there's anything different here than what has always been done.
Microsoft's use of personal, hidden, metadata in your Word files is probably a larger issue. From Woody's Office Watch dated 12/3/03:
Quote:
1. THE PERSONAL INFO HARVESTING SHTICK
Man, if Microsoft can't get it right, how can you?
The folks in Redmond continue to post documents with all sorts of
internal details on their Web site. While I haven't found any earth-
shattering anti-trust-busting bits of "metadata", the stuff I have
found leaves me wondering if anybody can get it right.
We're going to show you just how easy it is to publish Word documents
with information you might not want others to see. We'll do that by
taking examples from Microsoft itself.
Having shown how even the supposed Word experts can get trapped, in
future issues Woody's Watch (WOW and WOW-MM) we'll show you and
Microsoft how to publish just the document and no more.
In WOW-MM 4.15, I talked about two documents with embarrassing embedded
data. One contributed to the downfall of one of England's most
influential politicians. The other exposed a Microsoft dirty trick.
A WOW-MM reader pointed me to an entire collection of documents posted
by one state's Supreme Court. I didn't see anything particularly
damning in the documents, but they're strewn with names and email
addresses of clerks, law firms, and individuals; file locations, server
names, and so on - a few hours' worth of harvesting could lead to a
credible blueprint of sections of this Supreme Court's word processing
system.
Worth noting: few (if any) US federal agencies - from all branches of
government - post Word documents on the Web any more. Everything from
the White House to the CIA to the US Supreme Court appears to be in
PDF. Bravo.
AT&T researcher Simon Byers has a report on the hidden data problems
facing the Word-using world today - all 400,000,000 of us. You can
download it at http://www.user-agent.org/word_docs.pdf . One part of
his conclusion really hits home:
"...typical behavior patterns of Word users and the default settings of
the Word program leads to an uncomfortable state of affairs for Word
users concerned about information security."
This isn't strictly a voyeuristic exercise. When you leave dribs and
drabs of information floating around on the Web, there's no telling how
it can be used. I would guess that a dedicated cretin with a fast
Internet connection could come up with a working roadmap to parts of
Microsoft's development and marketing networks, just by looking at the
flotsam and jetsam buried in readily available documents - documents
posted on Microsoft's own Web site.
To recap, if you use Word 97 or 2000, Word maintains a detailed log of
who has edited the document, and where it was located when it was
opened - and there's nothing you can do about it.
If you use Outlook 2002 (the version in Office XP), and you send a
document by attaching it to an email message, Outlook brands the
document with the email address, name, and a number that can be traced
to the PC that was used to send the file (although you need access to
the PC to nail it for sure). It also brands the document with the
subject of the email message that carried the file.
If you explicitly tell Word 2002 to remove personally identifiable
information (Tools | Options | Security, check the box marked Remove
Personal Information From File Properties on Save, and uncheck the box
marked Store Random Number to Improve Merge Accuracy), and you send the
document with Outlook 2002, Outlook still sticks the number that can be
traced to your PC inside the file. I talked about that number - the
_AdHocReviewCycleID - in
http://www.woodyswatch.com/office/ar...ate.asp?v7-n50 .
I'm very happy to report that Outlook 2003 seems to be doing it right.
Finally. Telling Word 2003 to remove personally identifiable
information is sufficient, in a default installation of Outlook 2003,
to keep any personal info from being "branded" onto a doc when it's
sent attached to a message.
Microsoft's Knowledge Base talks about the kinds of data that can be
squirreled away in Word documents, and gives some tips for removing
that data (when it's possible). But the simple fact is that most
people, most of the time, don't bother.
Word 97 discussion: http://woodyswatch.com/kb?223790
Word 2000 discussion: http://woodyswatch.com/kb?237361
Word 2002 (Office XP) discussion: http://woodyswatch.com/kb?290945
Three weeks ago, in WOW 8.45, I also mentioned an article from Frank
Rice on the Microsoft Web site, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-
us/dnword2k2/html/odc_protectword.asp , that gives an excellent
overview of the problems and some solutions. Microsoft still hasn't
posted a similar article for Word 2003, but I noticed that they updated
one of their key personal info articles for Office XP, KB 223396, just
last week.
|
__________________
How you do anything is how you do everything.
|