Astrocloud

The police had probable cause to investigate. Even left wing judges have approved search warrants based on probable cause. This is not a "fishing expedition". The police knew what they were looking for and had a warrant to do it. If they didn't then I suppose that Rush Limbaugh's lawyers would have that evidence dismissed.


Perhaps the police need more evidence because the 'average citizen' doesn't have an army of lawyers working for the defense. I suppose in some neo-conservative's viewpoint -the only crimes worth investigating are those that the poor commit. After all, celebrities are rich and can afford decent lawyers. Prosecuting rich people in court will cost more more money than prosecuting the poor. So why don't the police prosecute only the fiscally viable? Is it because they'll get away with murder if the police don't investigate- (doesn’t anyone remember O.J. Simpson –anyone, ANYONE?)


And O.J. Simpson was just a useful comparison. Rush Limbaugh is in no way as culturally significant or as talented as O.J. Simpson.

Keith Richards was just an example. If you don't like him perhaps Robert Downey Jr. or Scott Weiland will be appropriate comparisons -although Rush Limbaugh isn't near as talented as either. And the Keith Richards example (if you bothered to follow the link that I gave) shows that sometimes -a vigorous police prosecution can set someone on the publically accepted "right" path. In Keith's case; it was a police prosecution that made him quit the smack.

It’s completely ridiculous to speculate about Rush Limbaugh’s medical records going public and revealing things like proctology exams. I know from my own vigorous drug prosecution that good lawyers can keep such records sealed. (Although I found Rush’s medical records on Kazaa and I think he’s not getting enough corn in his diet).