View Single Post
Old 12-02-2003, 09:39 AM   #19 (permalink)
dy156
cookie
 
dy156's Avatar
 
Location: in the backwoods
This guy writing for the Fort Worth paper may be biased, but it's the best explanation I've heard. I didn't know TCU's athletic director used to be the same for Miami(OH), and I doubt that they tried to shy away from playing a good team or wanted to play a bowl game in Fort Worth. Apparantly, there's also some connection between the Fort Worth Bowl and ESPN, which sheds light on the statements made by the ESPN writer posted above.



Quote:
Posted on Tue, Dec. 02, 2003

Frogs undercut by C-USA
On-the-fence TCU has bowl wishes ignored
By Gil Lebreton
Star-Telegram Staff Writer

The invitation has been graciously accepted.

TCU officials said Monday night the Horned Frogs will be happy to be the host team for the inaugural PlainsCapital Fort Worth Bowl.

Athletic director Eric Hyman called it "the toughest five days of my professional career," and he probably has the long distance phone bills to prove it.

On behalf of an 11-1 football team, the school's most successful in 65 years, Hyman took a tough stand and had the resolve -- some may call it "audacity" -- to see it through.

"The team finished 11-1, they did a hell of a job, and they got caught in some of the politics that were going on," Hyman said.

And therein sits the ugly side of this football story.

It wasn't that TCU chose to, for lack of a better phrase, play the academic card. As early as mid-November, Hyman said he informed Conference USA commissioner Britton Banowsky that because of the school's examination schedule, "We had a problem and could not play [in the GMAC Mobile Bowl]."

The dirty part of this story also wasn't that TCU had a prior "arrangement" to stay at home and play in the Fort Worth Bowl.

"I have never had one conversation with Pete Derzis [of ESPN] about playing in the Fort Worth Bowl," Hyman asserted Monday night.

Nor was the unseemly story that the Horned Frogs were somehow trying to duck a so-called quality opponent in Miami of Ohio.

"I would love to play Miami-Ohio," said Hyman, who was the AD at Miami before coming to TCU. "That's why we played Nebraska to open the season a year after we lost 28 seniors. That's why we tried to schedule Virginia Tech.

"This was totally, pure and simple, an academic issue."

No, the ugly side of the Frogs' bowl saga is that grown men, trying to settle some imagined score with TCU, banded together and tried to keep a bowl reward away from young men who richly deserved it.

As long as there have been bowl games, there have been deals bargained in smoke-filled rooms. If the Cotton Bowl, for example, couldn't get a Top-10 matchup, it shook enough hands to land a Doug Flutie, a Bo Jackson. Everyone seemed to go away happy.

But Jerry Silverstein, president of the Mobile Bowl, didn't want to take TCU's no for an answer. The question is why.

Why would any bowl official want to invite a team that said it couldn't come, whose students wouldn't be able to come, and whose fans didn't want to come?

Silverstein reportedly claims nobody told him until days after the TCU loss at Southern Miss that the Frogs wouldn't be able to come. Banowsky, the C-USA commissioner, told Hyman he informed Silverstein of TCU's intentions in mid-November.

Somebody is not telling the truth.

Around the country, supposedly, TCU has been getting scorched for trying to break the league's contract with the Mobile Bowl. In truth, that contract has always been written in fuzzy ink. Former commissioner Mike Slive suggested as much last year when, in announcing the deal with the then-new Sheraton Hawaii Bowl, he said the conference's four other bowl games would be allotted by taking into account "regional and various" considerations.

But Mobile pushed. And the people who run the athletic departments around C-USA stood back and allowed them.

Why?

Connect the dots. The dots that have TCU rumored to be leaving C-USA and bolting to the Mountain West Conference.

Having turned down the Mobile game, it was no secret TCU's choice was the Sheraton Hawaii Bowl. But Houston was awarded the invitation Monday to play in the Hawaii game.

Houston is staying in Conference USA.

Memphis will play North Texas in the New Orleans Bowl.

Memphis is staying in Conference USA.

See a pattern?

Only when Louisville agreed Monday night to fill the spot in the Mobile Bowl was a bowl berth for TCU finally secured.

A group of adults, trying to wage a grudge against other adults, nearly stole something away from a few dozen deserving kids.

If TCU aims to keep its integrity intact, it will leave this dying mess called Conference USA as soon as possible.

link
dy156 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360