Quote:
Originally posted by GakFace
the rule was "No fucking in the house" To any person's mind that sounds a lot like... "Anywhere but here" She broke the rule, and so she got caught red-handed. See if the mother didn't catch 'em when she did, then it would have been like letting them do the deed even though she told them not to do it in her house. See if she waited, then they would have realized they could do it again and again and again in the house as the mother would always wait until AFTER they were done. But if it was instilled in your head that you would be walked in on when you were in the act, wouldn't that make you want to follow the rule?
|
I see your point.
But I still don't agree with the method of terrorising you children as a means of getting through to them.
I don't think there is any good solution to it, it is just that the method described is the kind of intrusion on the daughters privacy that would most likley scar her for life.
Women are having trouble as it is relaxing and enjoying sex, should parents really put another hand of gravel in that machinery?
Rules are rules but to use rules to (even though not intentionally) hurt people is using rules the wrong way.
/begin edit
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
...
Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
...
/end edit