View Single Post
Old 11-21-2003, 05:12 PM   #39 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally posted by RippedSock1
At most, I would say that this piece is simply, "clever". People look at it and question it. It's pretty general in that sense though. It's just a blue box! Thoughts and questions will arise just because it's too general.
So Milo is "just clever?" Mondrian is "just clever?" What about Matisse?

What about Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin (enfant terrible of the BritPop movement)?

How "clever" was it for Andy Warhol to take a photograph of an accident and sell it as art? Indeed, is photography art in your opinion at all? What about his famous Marilyn Monroe prints?

Your comment "It's just a blue box" is very interesting. What does it mean to you? The fact that you're talking about it means something.

Quote:

I think that it did not take any skill whatsoever and I doubt the artist contemplated long on how to express his idea as a blue box. I believe that real art requires some skill and a little thought.
I'm not trying to be nasty, but this simply shows ignorance of the facts in this particular case. Klein spent years developing his famous blue colours. In fact this colour, or IKB (International Klein Blue) as it became known, was so new that it was successfully patented. From 1949 onwards he concentrated on blue and from 1957 onwards he painted 194 paintings in IKB.

Klein was one of the "New Realists" and is considered by most of the art world to be a master.

In 1954 Klein said "I believe that in the future, people will start painting pictures in one single colour, and nothing else but colour." He was a visionary, in the same way that Jackson Pollack was a visionary. I recommend the book Bright Earth - Art and the Invention of Colour by Philip Ball for a fascinating look at how colour has evolved, and how certain artists have used it, over the centuries (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books).

I wonder if you consider Pollacks work to be simply "dribbles of paint?"

Quote:
If anything, it's art only because the artist said it was.
Untrue. Klein is a famous artist whose work is collected around the world.

I should imagine the "installation art" of Christo (he of the famous pink ribbons around famous buildings) would also not be to your liking?

Mr Mephisto

Last edited by Mephisto2; 11-21-2003 at 05:23 PM..
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360