Hmm, I would agree with Moral Relativism on the Macro-scale, and heartily argue against it on the Micro-scale. In other words, different and distinct cultures may have utterly different morals. They prove the fitness of their morals by the time-tested method of survival as culture. In such case, they are completely entitled to their own morality, and its' inherent relative worth is a non-issue.
On the micro-scale, moral relativism between beings within the same culture is simply an excuse to wallaow in immorality and thumb one's nose at convention. We exist in society at the mercy of the Social Contract - I agree to give up certain freedoms so that I may reap the rewards of membership within my chosen society. If I choose to live in America, then I must follow overall American morality. Same can be said of any culture.
I do not accept child abuse, for example, as being morally correct. Yet it is a common practice in many areas of the world. That may be so there, but here, I will call the cops, social services, and take whatever legal steps I can to personally prevent such an action. I will also be well within the overall moral structure of my chosen culture. If I, on the other hand, travel to another area and interfere in the cultural mores of said area on the micro-scale then I violate their local mores and have erred. I may dislike it, and my mores may require action, but I am not legitimate if I call them immoral.
|