|
It’s not quite this simple, but this is how this thread reads so far:
Person A posts a link saying: “Here is ‘proof’ of a link between Al Qa-eda and Hussein. Game, set, match.”
Person B posts a picture of Rumsfeld and Hussein, suggesting that links don’t mean much. S/he might even have been implying that 'links' don’t equal ‘proof’. Person A says: “That isn't relevant, because the geo-political situation was different back then.”
Then Person B says: “But when your ‘proof’ occurred, it was a different geo-political situation also, just like the picture of Rumsfeld/Hussein.
Person A says: "That's different. And quit arguing things that support only your side".
Ye gods…
|