View Single Post
Old 11-16-2003, 11:38 PM   #36 (permalink)
Mojo_PeiPei
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
You should read Thomas Aquinas' writing on justified war, then you would actually know what your attempting to speak of. BTW I mispoke when I said the pope "blessed" the Afganistan campaign, but he said it was allowed within the confines of the Just War and in response to what happened with 9/11.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A644672

Quote:
A Just War

In respect to the rest of his work, these particular rules were not very important. However, even today the Church clings to them as a benchmark for justice. The rules themselves are in bold, the interpretations are in normal text, and the examples are in italics.

There were originally three by Aquinas;

The war must be started and controlled by the authority of state or ruler.

This means that for a war to be just, only the head of the nation can start it. It rules out civil war and rebellion.

This was not the case in the French Revolution because it was started by the people.

There must be a just cause.

This means that anyone and everyone being fought against must truly deserve it. A just cause would not include greed, revenge or pride, but it would include protection, self-defence and prevention of a worse evil.

This was not the case when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 because the invasion was to gain land.

The war must be for good, or against evil. Law and order must always be restored.

This means that no one should ever find themselves on the side of evil for any reason, whatever the politics involved. It also means that there is a duty to return to a life of normality after the war is over.

This was not the case in the Boer war when the British immigrants revolted against the Afrikaans, since it was a thinly disguised attempt to make South Africa part of the British Empire.

Two more rules were later added by the Catholic Church, when new developments meant that some countries were much stronger than others. This meant that they would be more likely to win any war they started, and so they could start wars for more trivial purposes.

The war must be a last resort.

This means that every other option must be tried first.

This was not the case in World War I since the countries involved were prepared for war at the earliest opportunity, and trapped each other into it.

The war must be fought proportionally.

This means do not use more force than necessary or kill more civilians than necessary.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.

Last edited by Mojo_PeiPei; 11-16-2003 at 11:40 PM..
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360