View Single Post
Old 11-16-2003, 12:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
Silvy
paranoid
 
Silvy's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
I'm no expert here but some thoughts come to mind:

- DNA testing is not 100% accurate even in the best of times. As evidence it is presented as a percentage based accuracy. So other evidence (even circumstantial is needed).

- Being arrested comes before DNA tests (usually) so they'd have to have a suspicion(sp?) first. If the test fails, they'd probably check some background anyway.

- To be convicted for a crime you not only would need to be at the scene but you would also not be somewhere else. iow: it's likely that the donor has a perfect alibi.
(never mind the fact that the donor could live thousands of miles away...)

- Don't the DNA tests show 'weird' results if the blood has been contaminated?
- Are tests done more than once to make sure?

In general: it's possible, but not likely in my opinion.
__________________
"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace. "
- Murphy MacManus (Boondock Saints)
Silvy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76