France and russia are only talking about pre-emption because the u.s. set the precedent. There's more evidence as to the u.s.'s effect on world peace.
Quote:
|
The funny part in finding the links for these was seeing how many people thought the US was going to use nukes in Iraq.
|
Why is that funny? I saw a press conference where donny "whalberg" rumsfeld was questioned about current research being done to develop low yield tactical nukes. He said they would be valuable for our efforts in iraq. If we had them we very well might have used them. And then we would have set a precedent making the use of nuclear weapons much more acceptable.
Is it still difficult to see the u.s. as a threat to world peace?