|
Because he is in the position to help and the opprotunity has fallen upon him! I'm quite sure if he was struggling then the article, which is clearly on his side by the fact that it doesn't even mention the governments reasons for being there, would have mentioned it. The property owner should be obligated to give more because he has more and because he has what is needed to help whereas nonproperty owners in can not very well provide the government with facilities!
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
|