|
That is an interesting point. If the ACLU are allowed to defend the free speech of NAMBLA, they will keep on defending until they expand to more extreme groups, kind of turning the "slippery slope" effect the pother way around.
However, I guess the ACLU can't really be accused of fighting NAMBLA's cause, they simply defend their right to express themselves. Which groups exists that do not offend any laws but are still denied free speech (not just a rethorical question, I am curious)? Are there groups too extreme to be given free speech ewxistiting today?
|