It astounds me what some people consider to be entertaining. Rather than bash the whole genre I'll confine my comments to this one show.
Did the gentlemen agree to be on a show whereby they may be lied to?
Did they knowingly consent to the possability that the situations they were placed in be false?
If they did not agree to the chance that they be duped, than this show did more than cross a line. This show outright lied. There is a difference in the Candid Camera type of deception and this. Being told your reserved hotel room is taken, that kind of joke, is a far cry from forcing men into unwanted sexual contact. That kind of lie is called assault.
If these guys signed up for a show where they knew really <i>anything</i> could happen, then even though anger is understandable, they asked for it.
I think that's a sick kind of duplicity, and I think the shemale should feel ashamed of herself. People with gender misidentidey have been struggling for acceptance and freedom from bigotry for some time. It is not easy for society to accept such a thing, nor is it close to accepting such sexual issues. For someone (supposedly) with these gender confusion issues to do this holds the whole group back.
She should also be found guilty of sexual assault. If I lie, to a certain extent, to get a woman in bed, I may be found guilty of sexual assault. This shemale knew she was abusing these men. They were not aware of her situation, and had not had the chance to choose if they wanted to deal with it. No man or woman should have to wonder if the object their affection is of the sex they appear.
I can only hope that someday in the future smarter people will prevail.
__________________
I can sum up the clash of religion in one sentence:
"My Invisible Friend is better than your Invisible Friend."
|