View Single Post
Old 10-30-2003, 09:19 AM   #30 (permalink)
rgr22j
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Liquor Dealer
What some of you don't realize is that in many rural areas there is no one to call for backup. As many of you have stated - barring the scenario of a rogue cop shooting the guy because he didn't like his haircut and planting the knife after the fact - the guy was bought and paid for when the knife came out - only mistake the officer made was in not shooting him before he got close enough to do bodily harm - he should have blown him away the instant the knife appeared.
The more important point about backup, I think, is that at first glance this is a situation involving asking a homeless person to move:

Quote:
Piot Dol, a friend of Kuol's, added that if the officer couldn't get Kuol to leave the building, he should have called for backup.

Const. Ira Macumber responded to a call to remove Kuol, 34, from a building at 1709 37th St. S.E. shortly after 12:30 a.m. Saturday.

Kuol, who was unemployed and homeless after being laid off from Lakeside Packers in Brooks earlier this year, was sitting outside the residence when Macumber arrived.

Investigators said after initially agreeing to leave, Kuol drew a knife and slashed the officer in the left bicep.
Ay least in my area, homeless people are pretty peaceful, non-violent, relatively harmless people. Most (mentally sane) homeless aren't about to slash police officers. I would imagine the officer felt the same way, getting a single homeless person to move would be peacefully routine. Besides, it would be a terrible image to send to homeless people if the police called in a SWAT team every time they needed to ask someone to move.

While I agree that the police officer was correct in defending himself from a suddenly angry, potentially life-threatening, knife-wielding man, I disagree that the officer should've shot him the instant the knife appeared. I would like to think that a police officer would try to convince the offender to go peacefully before opening fire. Simply producing a weapon isn't enough for me to justify shooting someone. It might be a temporary bout of stupid macho bravado, for example. But if he lunges at or points a gun at or in any way threatens the policeman, I stand by the cop's right to defend himself.

-- Alvin
rgr22j is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360