Quote:
|
This isn't a nice game of chess. If you think the US is the moral equivalent of North Korea then you are far removed from reality. I'm sorry I don't address what YOU want addressed, but there is more to this issue then what just YOU think is important.
|
First of all, what the hell are you talking about? I don't know where you would get the idea that i think that the us is morally equivalent to north korea, or even that i think of things in term of moral superiority. Why do you capitalize YOU like somehow i am selfish to expect you to actually address something i posted when you quote it.
Its not about addressing what i think is more important, it is about quoting me and then making a jump from what i said to something that is not at all anywhere near what i said.
I merely said it was hypocritical, which it is for the us to try to deny other countries what we have used to our advantage. Nuclear weapons.
Your earlier reply to that:
Quote:
|
Yes we should let every 3rd world nation, ruled by who knows what kinda of psychopath, hold a trump card over us.
|
How are those even related? Were you attempting to imply that i was advocating nuclear proliferation? That i think that everyone should have equal access to nuclear weapons? I don't think anyone should have nukes. Maybe i just misread you because there is nothing in my post that says anything like that. You also didn't say it wasn't hypocritical, so am i to just assume then that your reply contains implicit agreement with what i said in mine? Yes, that is what i will do. Thank you for implicitly agreeing with me about america's hypocritical stance on nuclear weapons.
I don't care what you say, just don't quote me and then make an unwarranted jump in logic in an attempt to discredit me. Just because i say it is hypocritcal doesn't mean i want everyone to have nuclear weapons.