|
Why discuse the real themes of Bowling for Columbine when Moore didnt even discuse them? Why did he try to link the murders to a plant in Littletown that doesnt make weapons of mass destruction? Why did he not talk about the killers history of mental problems, medications, being teased by the community, and Nazi fetishes, and the fact that they chose Hitler's birthday to kill.
Had Moore done this, as all the reall journalists and psychologists examining the Columbine Killings have done, then he would not have had a sexy cool movie to sell.
I find it odd that such a "documentary Maker" as Moore didnt even mention, not once, the most probable cause for the Columbine Shootings.
So again, if Moore avoided the issue in his own movie, and further more, delibratly inserted false and misleading information into his ficticious film, why should its "true message" be discussed?
|