Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
All I'm saying is its a spit in the face when all those fucks forget when we stuck out our necks for their security. If it were up to the French Saddam would still be in power, and would have a nuclear arsenal (tks yu~ Osirirak). Maybe their lucrative oil contracts where a factor in there staunch opposition. Perhaps it was the fact that they were the biggest hardware supplier to the Iraqi Military. And as far as the weapons go, you are delusional if you really think Saddam didn't have them. Also Iraq was a hub of terrorism, if not al-queda there were several other well noted terrorist organizations and celebrities there (Abu Nidal, Ansar Al- Islam, ANO, various support for Palestinian terrorist organizations... http://www.terrorismanswers.org/sponsors/iraq.html). Fact of the matter the only reason other nations opposed the war was to cock block the U.S. THe U.N. is a joke and wouldn't exist if it weren't for the U.S. seeing as to we foot 25% of the bill for it as well as man support for its various operations. Bush sent the U.N. to the plate and in very convincing fashion they struck out looking. Like he said on the eve of war "THe World shares our assesment of the Danger posed by Saddam, but not our resolve".
|
What on earth is a "cock block?"
If it's such a delusional stance to think that there were no WMDs in Iraq then why even look for them? Everyone should "know" they're already there, unless
everyone is delusional. It must be tough living in a world of delusional people and delusional countries...
Jojo_PeiPei, why doesn't the US just threaten to pull their funding if the UN doesn't just agree with everything the US say? Surely the UN can't go one without the US's 25%, right? I mean, why fund a joke?