Quote:
Originally posted by Food Eater Lad
So you are saying in the 1800's terrorists wanted to take over the nation so they could wage war globally and rid of the world of the infidel? That a nation wanted to save the US from factions that would kill each other?
And your forgetting that communists have killed well over 100 million people, I am glad that we supported the lesser of the two evils. It sucks, as you agree, but how much worse would the world be with MORE communist nations being supported by a still in existance Soviet Union?
|
Nice attempt at spin. Your justification, as previous stated, had to do with how Saddam was treating his citizens not how terrorists were even involved in anyone's imagination. There is no proven link between the secular former Iraqi government and bin Laden. None. Zero. Bupkis.
Not forgetting the millions killed by pseudo-socialism, but you've appear to have forgotten the dead nations of the American continent.
As I stated many of those dictators had only a passing glimmer of anti-socialism in thier programs; extracting maximum power and self agrandiziment (sp?) was much more important. Don't confuse the lable with the reality.
And don't try to spin what I write as I don't walk away from bushwa.
Now, how about giving me an answer to my question?
2Wolves